How Can It Be That a Christian Goes On Sinning?

image

In this week’s Life of Jesus class, we considered the difficult reality that Christians are far from perfect, and the fact that they continue to struggle — sometimes mightily — with the ongoing reality of sin in their lives.

St. Paul writes about precisely this struggle in Romans 7:

I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate. Now if I do what I do not want, I agree with the law, that it is good. So now it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me. For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh. For I have the desire to do what is right, but not the ability to carry it out. For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I keep on doing. Now if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me.

This passage resonates with many of us, but it is difficult to come to terms with.

Leon Morris writes:

No believer is completely sinless. He is still a sinner, no matter how much out of character his sin is.

There may be little or no difference between a particular act of sin, as performed by a Christian, and that same act of sin, as performed by the non-believer.  The vital difference it that, for the non-believer, who is not yet being transformed and sanctified by the Holy Spirit, the sin is in keeping with his character, for this person has not yet come into relationship with Christ, he has not yet been redeemed by Christ’s atonement, and he does not have the Holy Spirit abiding in his life, performing his work of turning him into someone who more closely resembles Jesus.

For the Christian, the act of sin may be the very same, but it is different because this act is out of character for this person. He is in relationship with Jesus, he has the Holy Spirit at work in his life, and he has a new identity in Christ. Outwardly, there may not always be abundant evidence of this difference, or of the sanctifying work of the Spirit, but it is nonetheless a true and vital distinction.

When the Christian falls short, and he acts in ways that are at odds with his true identity, he may feel so despondent as to doubt the reality that he is a Christian at all:

What happens when he does sin? He feels dreadful about it. Then why does he do it? He simply does not understand (v. 15). In view of all that Christ has done for him and the resources Christ makes available for him, surely he should have resisted the temptation? He does not want to sin. He knows that. He knows that he ought not sin. But he is weak (in the flesh). Because he does not want to sin he can say with Paul, I do what I do not want to do (v. 16). When he reflects on that sin he is apt to say, nothing good lives in me (v. 18). But he cannot deny his responsibility; his sin proceeds from what he is. He knows that he did it himself. But his regret is deep and genuine, and he cries, O wretched man that I am! The sin is not the product of regeneration; it takes place despite regeneration. There is that within the believer (the old Adam?) which leads him to sin even when he does not want to. And when he sins he cannot but see that there is a power of evil that is too strong for him; thus he is enslaved to sin (v. 14), a prisoner (v. 23). But his inability to explain how he, a regenerate and redeemed person, falls into sin does not give him license to deny either the fact of his sin or the fact of his regeneration.

The Christian is redeemed, and the Christian sins.  Our feelings may argue that these cannot both be true at the same time, but the Bible assures us of this reality.  We struggle with the tension of it, and that tension will not be fully resolved on this side of Heaven.

He Was Lost And Is Found

Last week, the Life of Jesus class studied the parable of the Prodigal Son. We considered Luke 15:31-32:

And [the Father] said to [his elder son], Son, you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours. It was fitting to celebrate and be glad, for this your brother was dead, and is alive; he was lost, and is found.

Joel Green writes:

Accepting his unworthiness to be counted as a son, the younger had opted for the status of a day laborer; having severed his relationship as a son, he hoped to reestablish it as a hireling. Ironically, the elder son comports himself now not as a son but as a slave.

Just as the father had run out to meet his younger son, so, again dishonoring himself, he leaves the banquet over which he is host in order to plead with his elder son. Calling him son and conferring upon him the honor of an equal, he seeks restoration. In doing so, however, he advances a condition—namely, that the elder acknowledge the divine necessity of celebrating the recovery of the lost. As the son of his father, the elder must embrace his fathers gracious will. If he is really his father’s son, he will act as he has acted and rejoice at the recovery of the lost (cf. vv 5–6, 10). Hence, the father’s reference to his younger son as this brother of yours is presented as an invitation to restoration.

The younger son had utterly thrown off his relationship with his father.  For the father, it was as if his son was dead.  The return of the son to the father was a restoration like a return from death.

Why Do Churches Recite Creeds?

In last week’s class, the topic of creeds and their recitation came up.  For some, a congregation reciting a creed (or, for that matter, any part of a liturgy) may bring up uncomfortable feelings, or may even seem unhealthy.

Many Christians, over many centuries, have found value in the creeds, and have used them as an integral part of worship.  Peter Kemeny makes the case for creeds:

We recite the historic Christian creeds: the Apostles’ Creed and the Nicene Creed. Is this vain repetition? Hollow formalism? I say no. Here are my reasons:

In reciting creeds, we are saying to God, “here are the main things we believe as we come together to worship You.” The word creed itself comes from the Latin word, credo, which means “I believe.”

Second, reciting the historic Christian creeds underscores the unity of the church down through the ages. It is a way for a congregation of Christians to say, “we stand shoulder to shoulder with the church across the centuries. We hold to the faith ‘that was once for all entrusted to the saints’ (Jude 3).”

It’s unlikely that the historic creeds of the faith will be improved upon as summaries of what the Bible teaches. Let’s hold on to them.

Isn’t Liturgical Worship Dry and Lifeless?

In Tuesday’s Life of Jesus class, we talked a bit about liturgical worship in church.

No one form or expression has an exclusive claim to the right worship of God.  Personal experience and one’s personality may draw a person to one style of worship, or make some other style less appealing to that same person.

Some may think that liturgical worship, such as the services in the Anglican Book of Common Prayer, is especially prone to becoming dry and lifeless.

One writer addresses this:

All forms of worship run this risk. This is more of an indicator of the state of one’s heart than the form of worship. In fact, most churches do have some kind of “ritual” in their worship even if they don’t call it that, i.e., it follows the same form week after week: sing songs, give announcements, pray, hear a sermon, and conclude with a song. Anything we do and any form of worship can become empty and meaningless when it is not done in the right spirit; it will become merely acting out a part rather than participating with our hearts, minds, and spirits. But if our worship is truly Spirit-filled and our hearts are open to God, then our worship will glorify God. The key to authentic worship is having a heart and attitude of praise and reverence that seeks to earnestly glorify God. Liturgy seeks to facilitate true worship.

There is no absolute “right” or “wrong” form of worship, in fact, it may be that certain forms are more [accessible] to some people than others. But worship that seeks to glorify God (and not merely to make the individual most comfortable or stimulated) will strive to create a worship environment that is utterly pleasing to God, whatever form that may take.

Do Anglicans Believe in Praying to Saints?

image

In Tuesday’s Life of Jesus class, we were talking about how some Christians, including Roman Catholics, request intercession from saints, such as St. Mary.

1 Timothy 2:5 tells us:

For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus

Jesus is the one and only mediator.  The Bible does not leave a place for any other agent between a believer and God.

Article 22 (of the Anglican 39 Articles) states:

The Roman [Catholic] doctrine concerning Purgatory, Pardons, worshipping and adoration as well of Images as of Relics, and also Invocation of Saint, is a fond thing vainly invented, and grounded upon no warranty of Scripture; but rather repugnant to the word of God.

While individual Anglicans are not unanimous on this topic, Will Briggs makes the case that the Anglican Church does not believe that praying to the saints is okay:

If God is not the object of our prayers, and the agent of our prayers, then we are asserting that we can reach out to God in our own strength, or through the strength of someone else.  This undermines the work of Christ and suggests that we do not have absolute need of [him] – something that goes against the heart of the Christian faith.  Christ alone is our mediator.

We do respect the “Saints” as particular exemplars of the faith and count them amongst the “church triumphant” – but we count them as forebears – brothers and sisters in service, not the captains that we follow.

Can I Withstand Temptation?

image

A discussion in this week’s Life of Jesus class reminded me of 1 Corinthians 10:13:

No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it.

Does God Cause Christians to Suffer?

Our discussion this week in the Life of Jesus class raised a question about suffering, and about God’s will.

Romans 8:28 tells us:

And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.

God causes all things, even the terrible and traumatic, to work together for his glory, and for good.  This can be a hard truth to accept.  We want a God who will make us feel better…right now…and take away the pain, and the sense of injustice when innocent or defenseless people suffer.

Just this week, senseless terrorism at the Boston Marathon finish line took the lives of three, and maimed or injured many dozens more.  This is not only a tragedy, it is a challenge to our faith and trust in God.

John MacArthur writes:

Every aspect of our lives is in God’s hands and will be divinely used by the Lord not only to manifest His own glory but also to work out our own ultimate blessing…

We are always in God’s hands.  We may not feel like we are, but the Bible assures us of that truth.

MacArthur goes on:

Paul is not saying that God prevents His children from experiencing things that can harm them. He is rather attesting that the Lord takes all that He allows to happen to His beloved children, even the worst things, and turns those things ultimately into blessings.

No matter what our situation, our suffering, our persecution, our sinful failure, our pain, our lack of faith-in those things, as well as in all other things, our heavenly Father will work to produce our ultimate victory and blessing. The corollary of that truth is that nothing can ultimately work against us. Any temporary harm we suffer will be used by God for our benefit (see 2 Cor. 12:7–10). All things includes circumstances and events that are good and beneficial in themselves as well as those that are in themselves evil and harmful.

Why Does God Allow So Much Suffering?

image

In this week’s Life of Jesus class, we talked quite a bit about sin, suffering, and God’s will.

Why does God allow so much suffering?  It’s not an easy question, and the answers we do have are less than fully satisfying.

Jared Wilson, quoted on Justin Taylor’s web site, offers ten reasons.  Here is just one:

To remind us that the world is broken and groans for redemption

Romans 8:20-23 describes the condition, not just of the human race, but of all creation.

For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to corruption and obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation has been groaning together in the pains of childbirth until now. And not only the creation, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies.

We experience corruption.  We yearn for freedom and redemption.  We live in a world that is subjected to futility, in bodies not yet redeemed.  It is a frustrating way to live, but God has a purpose: to make us whole, and to make us wholly his.

This side of Heaven, we cannot fully know why God allows what he allows, but 2 Corinthians 4:8-9 gives us hope in God’s purposes and in his protection:

We are afflicted in every way, but not crushed; perplexed, but not driven to despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed

How Did Jesus’ Disciples Know What Jesus Said and Did During His Desert Temptation?

image

In last week’s Life of Jesus class, somebody asked how Jesus disciples could have recorded in the gospels the events and words of Jesus’ temptation in the desert, when they were not present for them.  The same question could be asked about Jesus’ prayers in the Garden of Gethsemane, when the disciples had all fallen asleep.

The site bible.org offers a response:

I think we have essentially four options in questions like this:
(1) assume that it is wholly fictitious;
(2) assume that someone besides Jesus told the disciple(s) about the incident;
(3) assume that the Holy Spirit told the disciples later; or
(4) assume that Jesus told the disciple(s) about the incident.

The writer addresses, in turn, each of the first three options, and then…

When we come to view 4, it certainly raises some interesting questions, such as “How did the disciples find out? Did they sit down and interrogate Jesus about these events? Did they function as reporters?” What is interesting to me is that not once do we read anywhere in the Gospels, as far as I am aware, in which an evangelist says, “I got this story from so and so.” That is, nowhere in the Gospels does the evangelist tell us that he used a source for a particular story. Yet Luke’s prologue and John’s epilogue tell us, in broad strokes, that they did this very thing. So it seems to me that the M.O. of the evangelists is not to tell who their sources were, but to indicate that they did use human, eyewitness sources for their narratives and, on many occasions, were the eyewitnesses themselves. All it takes is for us to use a slightly sanctified imagination to envision the disciples sitting around the fire with Jesus, asking him all sorts of questions. We know that they did this with prophecy (see Matt 24); so why couldn’t they do this with history, too?

The four gospels make no claim to represent everything that Jesus ever said and did during his three-year ministry on earth.  It is reasonable to conclude that many conversations happened that were never written down or, if they were, did not end up in the gospels we have today.

What Is a Christian?

A question came up this week in the Life of Jesus course at St. John’s Vancouver: “What is a Christian?”

Romans 10:9 is a good answer:

If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.

Noted theologian (and St. John’s parishioner) Dr. J.I. Packer also  addresses this topic:

True Christians are people who acknowledge and live under the word of God. They submit without reserve to the word of God written in “the Book of Truth” (Dan 10:21), believing the teaching, trusting the promises, following the commands. Their eyes are upon the God of the Bible as their Father and the Christ of the Bible as their Savior.

Christians will tell you, if you ask them, that the Word of God has both convinced them of sin and assured them of forgiveness. Their consciences, like Luther’s, are captive to the Word of God, and they aspire like the psalmist, to have their whole lives brought into line with it. “Oh, that my ways were steadfast in obeying your decrees!” “Do not let me stray from your commands.” “Teach me your decrees. Let me understand the teaching of your precepts.” “Turn my heart toward your statutes.” “May my heart be blameless toward your decrees” (Ps 119:5, 10, 26-27, 36, 80). The promises are before them as they pray, and the precepts are before them as they go about their daily tasks.

The web site gotquestions.org offers another good response:

The Bible teaches that the good works we do cannot make us acceptable to God. Titus 3:5 says, “He saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit.” So, a Christian is someone who has been born again by God (John 3:3; John 3:7; 1 Peter 1:23) and has put faith and trust in Jesus Christ. Ephesians 2:8 tells us that it is “…by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God.”

A true Christian is a person who has put faith and trust in the person and work of Jesus Christ, including His death on the cross as payment for sins and His resurrection on the third day. John 1:12 tells us, “Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God.” The mark of a true Christian is love for others and obedience to God’s Word (1 John 2:4, 10). A true Christian is indeed a child of God, a part of God’s true family, and one who has been given new life in Jesus Christ.